From a 2020 paper, by Long and Magerko, who synthesized a variety of interdisciplinary literature into a set of core competencies.
Thinking about ChatGPT as a pedagogy problem, rather than a plagiarism problem, is a way to approach teaching generatively.
For example, scaffolding mitigates library anxiety, imposter syndrome, and accidental plagiarism. Therefore, rather than assigning a big, summative paper or project at the end of the course, breaking it up into stages with student reflection reinforces original work and a growth mindset that can reduce the perceived need for students using a tool such as ChatGPT.
To get started, you may want to check out this Featured Resource by Daniel Stanford, award-winning learning experience designer:
You can subscribe to Daniel Stanford's substack here
ASCCC is holding a webinar entitled, "Academic Integrity Policies in the Age of Artificial Intelligence," on September 4 from 12:00-1:30. You can click on the image below to register.
Since generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools are still relatively new to higher education, many students may be unaware of what is allowed or not allowed in a particular course. Since there is no college policy on AI use, the rules might differ from one course to the next.
Consider, for example:
Attribution: "Syllabus Statements" by Camosun College Library is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
Use these tools below to learn more about issues and ways to incorporate AI in your pedagogy.